Perspective of Materiality in Archaeological Heritage

In the wider professional community gathered around notion of archaeological heritage, there is an undisputed consensus that material traces have to be preserved for research, education and presentation, present future generations. However, climate change, pollution, intensive urbanization other perils a significant source risk remains in their original settings. Additionally, evidence may form skeletal remains, cave drawings, landscapes or negatives missing objects materials. Underwater finds, stone monuments, archaeobotanical traces, fortifications, wooden sanctuaries all also constitute remains. order today, each these examples requires various conditions, processing preservation after excavation. Finally, artefacts ecofacts gain different places contemporary context.
 Bearing mind variety situations forms which finds occur, it necessary reconsider scope content embraced by term heritage past, under conditions rapid changes. Here theoretical standpoint applied derived from Bruno Latour, about role actants, live non-live participants social processes. this sense, – ecofacts, are parts diverse processes negotiation reshaping environment. They can equally influence, entice, stop change processes.
 contribute solving dilemma, text discusses materialities at intersection conservation perspectives. It argued that, when facing current problems, especially regard situ preservation, answers inspiration should sought conceptualization materiality, as guide specific knowledges, leading new insights.